oppossed Guest Oct 12, 2005 7:05 AM	the by-laws and the constitution call for goodstanding 24 mos. prior to the election to be a valid candidate for election. the same is true for appt. to office is it not? the rules state all candidates for office, johnny wouldn't be making a mistake and appt. a non-eligable person would he?
p/j //jonny Guest Oct 12, 2005 11:09 AM	you can/ bet someones in the jamie s ,.. now ,.. ,.. who/s who/
j.j. Guest Oct 17, 2005 7:55 AM	if he cant hold office why would john risk putting him on?
MAKE A MOVE Guest Oct 17, 2005 1:29 PM	There's been a lot of TALK concerning "change" which is code for getting rid of the Perry's. The story of the Feds in the Local is a diversion from the real issue of getting rid of John and his family. The members need a few victories to build the momentum to finally rid our union of theses leaches and connivers. P.J.is a good guy. The only thing he did bad was let John Perry appoint him to the E-Board. I believe the first and easiest effort in our quest to clean up the local is to overturn Perry's appointment of P.J., who was in fact declared ineligible to run. Any person who ran for Trustee or any member that voted has a cause of action under Herman v. American Postal Workers Union, 995 F.Supp. 1, which is a 1997 federal court case out of the District of Columbia. The Court in Herman ruled that the Union cannot undermine the members' right to vote for the candidate of their choice. Two possible arguments can be made in P.J.'s case: (1) Using "past practice," the next highest vote-getter should get appointed instead, or (2) a new election for P.J.'s trustee spot. A similar argument can be made in regard to the President's position. A candidate for trustee or a voting member or both can start a cause of action by going directly to the Labor Department. If you do make a move, first read the Herman case and seek legal advice on how you can use it in the above instances. After we hit Perry with this, we'll bomb him into submission with more stuff. You can't beat him any other way. He controls the books and the admission of new members, which he is actively pursuing contrary to the best interest of the established members who have been struggling for years to make ends meet. It's time to put up or shut up. So anybody with an interest, a voter or candidate, needs to step forward and get the ball rolling.
Will the real P.J Guest Oct 17, 2005 3:45 PM	If P.J. is truely for the members he will break away from the dictater and SPEAK OUT!
Peek-a-boo Guest Oct 17, 2005 5:19 PM	I will start the petition myself!
p'j forgets,.. Guest Oct 17, 2005 8:10 PM	WHY DON'T P/J STAND UP FOR US ,.ALL HE'S GOT TO DO IS PUT HIS HEAD ON, AND REMENBER ,.// HOW PERRY WAS AGAINST ,..HIM ,. WHEN HE WAS SPEC,.ING CONCEPT FDC ,.. BREDE ,..COME P/J ,.. DID THEY BUY YOU OUT ,.. SHOW WHAT YOU ARE ,.. I STOOD THERE AND LISTEN TO YOU CRY WHY NOT ,ME ,.. YOU KNOW ,IT ,.AND WE KNOW IT ,.. WHY WHAT DID HE PROMISE YOU ,.. ????YOUR BROTHERS ARE WAITING ,.. TO SEE YOUR REMARKS ,WHY YOUR THERE ,.. WITH THE GUY THAT HAS HIT YOU IN YOUR WALLET MANY A TIME,..
MAKE A MOVE Guest Oct 18, 2005 5:14 AM	Give P.J. a break. Even if he wanted to do something it would be futile bacause he is outvoted 6-1 because of all the Perry puppets on the E-Board. The members, numbering in the 100's, outnumber the E-Board. The members need to step up in filing petitions and educating the ignorant ones which are far from lacking in 82. Because John has run a shoddy and unprofessional organization for years, he has left himself open for a multitude of lawsuits that inevitably will send him packing. By starting with challenging John's APPOINTMENT of P.J. (not the election), we can build the momentum to ultimately defeat this vermin.
to make a move Guest Oct 18, 2005 5:31 AM	So your opposed to the appointment but have no problem with the man?
oppossed Guest Oct 19, 2005 6:19 AM	the first step is to make the Eboard a true representation of the members,if anyone is ineligable they should step down.the board should do it's duty and investigate all trostees of funds and all officers and stewards to see if the best intrests of the members are being served.
MAKE A MOVE Guest Oct 20, 2005 2:31 PM	I AM OPPOSED TO DICTATORSHIP.
Anonymous Guest Oct 27, 2005 7:08 AM	hey fed why not start here with an easy one?
UP YOUR'S Guest Oct 29, 2005 4:40 PM	APPOINT THIS JOHN.
Anonymous Guest Oct 31, 2005 6:50 AM	how can this guy sleep hes top listman at one company top spare everywhere else runs against johnny and loses then gets appointed twice even when he isn't eligable nice guy but something dont seem right.
Anonymous Guest Nov 28, 2005 7:44 AM	WHERE IS THE PETITION?
HMMM Guest Nov 28, 2005 8:39 AM	HEY MAKE A MOVE IF YOUR ABOVE POST IS SO GREAT WHHHHY DONT YOU GET ALAWYER AND SUE
P.J Guest Nov 28, 2005 8:28 PM	NO COMMENT
Anonymous Guest Nov 29, 2005 6:39 AM	why do they stay quiet?.....$3000.00 a year,free dues,preffered hiring,top list position.....THE COST?.....ALL SELF RESPECT
YUP Guest Nov 29, 2005 6:42 AM	MONEY TALKS BULLSHIT WALKS
Anonymous Guest Nov 29, 2005 4:50 PM	why would,nt john put the next highest vote getter o0n the eboard not appoint one
Anonymous Guest Jan 19, 2006 3:33 PM	ASK ABOUT THIS AT THE NEXT MEETING
guest Guest Jan 20, 2006 7:58 AM	p.j. don't let the b.s. bother you their just jealous
Anonymous Guest Jan 21, 2006 8:21 AM	the feds have the by-laws so i guess we will all find out soon enough
p;j Guest Jan 21, 2006 8:32 AM	FORGOT REALLY QUICK HOW THE Y WOULD LET HIM STAND FOR HRS WAITING TO GO TO WORK AND HOW HIS BROTHER DID SAME .. I GUESS MAYBE HE MIGHT JUST BE OUR WIRE GUY FOR THE INVESTAGTORS HOPE THATS TRUE
Anonymous Guest Jan 21, 2006 8:41 AM	Sounds like John will be making PJ do a strip teese like John made Rodney Simoenes do when he thought Rodney was wearing a wire after Rodney went to the cops!
Anonymous Guest Feb 03, 2006 7:26 AM	ASK ABOUT THIS AT THE MEETING
Anonymous Guest Feb 04, 2006 7:07 AM	what does THE TRUTH think about this?